Role in World War I: The example of the Lusitania
What are the top reasons for war? At first
thought, imperial governments or self-defense may come to mind. The
truth is war is often planned years in advance and carefully orchestrated
to advance the Great Plan.
Following the money trail illuminates that war
is not possible without people profiting financially and is often fought for
reasons very different than what is shared with the public. The
Lusitania medal shown on the right and explained in this article, tells
a powerful message about what World War I was really about.
The same New World Order
"banksters" or money trust families that designed the Federal Reserve
have for centuries profited from war. Senator Louis McFadden (1876-1936)
is one of many credible people who have documented the direct
involvement of this powerful elite in 19th century wars. The list of 20th century involvement in promoting
wars is also long and includes the Lusitania operation in World War I,
funding both Germany and England during World War II, creating the conditions
for the Korean War in 1953,
the Vietnam War, the Gulf War, and the war on terrorism.
President George Washington and other founders
of our country had first-hand experience with how elite families in
Europe bankrolled military actions for their personal gain. In his
farewell address on September 17, 1796, George Washington warned
Americans to be on guard against alliances with Europe. The Rothschild
banking dynasty is highlighted in this article because they became the
leading banking force as a result of Wellington's war with Napolean,
have profited from numerous conflicts, and led the creation of the
Federal Reserve.1
Their involvement in World War I is a classic example of advancing the
Great Plan.
The Four Prongs
World War I was proclaimed to be the war to end all
wars.
The secret societies, the real power behind
the British imperial empire, were very skilled at hiding behind puppet
governments. For the Great Plan to advance in the 20th century new
puppets or multiple fronts were needed. The front organizations would need to appear as
one of the missing pieces for global peace and prosperty.
The real purpose of World War I was to create front organizations for
a one world
government. The New World Order elite accomplished this with a four prong
plan to create incredible suffering and debt so that people around the
world would increasingly be willing to forfeit national sovergnity. The
first prong of the one world government attempt, called the League of
Nations, failed but it did succeed in building momentum for the creation
of the United Nations in 1945 after World War II. The second prong, the bank for central banks
called the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) was successfully
implemented. The BIS is in Basel, Switzerland and was established by
the
Hague agreements of 1930. Today the BIS is one of the primary New
World Order front
organizations
advancing the one world currency part of the Great Plan.
The
third prong, the termination of the Austrian royal family's veto power
of Catholic popes, was accomplished with the assassination of Archduke
Franz Ferdinand in 1914. The Catholic Church for over a thousand years
has been on the forward line in combating the people who are advancing
the Great Plan. Placing an agent in the seat of Peter paid
great dividends for Satan during the crusades and was a Great Plan
priority objective when Leo XIII died in 1903. The New World Order's
candidate,
Mariano Rampolla del Tindaro (17 August 1843 –17 December 1913) was
about to be elected pope when at the last momentum Austrian Emperor
Francis Joseph I imposed a veto. The veto during the Conclave came
through the agency of Cardinal Jan Puzyna de Kosielsko. When Franz
Ferdinand was assassinated
the Austrian hereditary veto power,
a key obstacle to previous attempts to corrupt the Catholic Church, died with him. This is
all less surprising when you remember that we are warned in 2
Corinthians 11:13-15 that religious institutions can at times be
infiltrated and controlled by Satan's agents.
The
fourth prong was the destruction of the imperial Russian family. The
imperial Russian family had frustrated attempts to advance the Great
Plan since 1613. Their elimination took place in two parts with the
first being the February Revolution abolishing the crown. Nicholas II
(18 May 1868 - 17 July 1918), the last Emperor of Russia, abdicated
power on March 15, 1917. The second part was his murder along with his
family after King George V refused to allow him exile in the United
Kingdom. The British elite advancing the Great Plan wanted revenge for
the
Romanov interference during the United States Civil War.
Russia's blue-water navy was
sent to protect Lincoln's government with ships deployed to both San
Francisco and New York. The Civil War alliance between President Abraham
Lincoln and Russian Tsar Alexander II
was a key reason the South was defeated.
War is necessary for debt enslavement
The cycle of debt often starts with selling
weapons and is accelerated by war. While governments go in debt to buy weapons,
the weapons
manufacturers and bankers financing the purchase profit. The key owners of the
weapons corporations and banks are often interlocking or even the same families. The country in the 21st century that buys the most weapons is the US.
The total
US weapons purchases exceed the combined sum of all other nations. Not
surprisingly, government officials, paid experts, and the corporate owned media promote calls for war
to drive up debt.
Creating war debt to advance the Great Plan is a
pattern that has repeated many times. To see how corporations such as
Halliburton play an important New World Order role, the documentary
Iraq
for Sale is recommended.
Historians
are sometime bought by the elite to argue and publish false reasons for
wars. The authors of war routinely seek to have their roles downplayed or outright
dismissed.
President Woodrow
Wilson claimed the main cause of World War I was the wealthy had too
much control over Germany, Russia and Austria. Lenin went on record that
the banking merchants orchestrated the war.2
We now know that both Wilson and Lenin were
correct. The more precise explanation is New World Order financial interests advancing the Great Plan, cloaked in good intentions and
nationalism, started World War I.
How World War I started
As
with most wars, World War I started many years before the first shot was
fired. In 1870, the Franco-Prussian War resulted in France's defeat by
Germany. After the war, the triple alliance was formed consisting of
Germany, Austro-Hungary and Italy. Another factor was the policy of
Weltpolitic or the global imperial policy of Kaiser Wilhelm the Second.
The Moroccan crisis of 1905 to 1911 also was a factor leading to World
War I. There were additional wars that involved Serbia and led to
increased tension with Austria.
On June 28, 1914, the heir to the
Austro-Hungarian throne, Archduke Franz Ferdinand, was assassinated in
Sarajevo. The Black Hand Serbian secret society, with connections to
multiple New World Order fronts including Freemasonry, the British
Empire and French intelligence, took credit. The four prong plan to
create World War I
begun and ended in 1918 with at least 20 million killed.
How the United States was fooled to join this
European War
Citizens of the
US were successfully fooled to enter the war in 1917 by a series of
cleverly orchestrated efforts. President Woodrow Wilson was directly
involved in the deceptions and formally sanctioned the US
participation with a secret agreement with England on March 9,
1916. We know about this
agreement today because the agreement was leaked and confirmed by Sir
Edward Grey, Ambassador Walter Hines Page, C. Hartley Grattan, and
Colonel Edward Mandell House.
The focus of this article is on the centerpiece
of the pro-war propaganda which preceded the 1916 secret agreement and
involved sinking a passenger ship named the Lusitania.
Winston Churchill and Woodrow Wilson, in an operation financed by the
major banking houses, arranged for the shipment of weapons on the
Lusitania in May of 1915. The Lusitania luxury ocean liner was owned by
the Cunard Steamship Line Shipping Company and officially part of the
British auxiliary navy. The ship's owners were paid
£218,000
a year (£150,000
for reserve military service and
£68,000
to carry Royal mail). As an auxiliary naval ship, the Lusitania was
under orders from the British Admiralty to ram any German ship seeking
to inspect her cargo. In 1915, it was against US law to put weapons on
a passenger ship traveling to England or Germany.
Three German spies
attempted to confirm that the 90 tons of unrefrigerated butter destined
for a British naval base were weapons and ammunition.3
The spies were detained on the ship. The weapons
loaded on the Lusitania were seen by the German dock workers and
reported to the German embassy. To warn Americans about the weapons
shipment, the Imperial German Embassy attempted to place an
advertisement in 50 East Coast newspapers. The ads were printed with a
date of April 22, 1915, but the US State Department blocked all the ads
except one. George Viereck, the man who placed the ads for the embassy,
protested to the State Department on April 26 that the ads were blocked.
Viereck met with Secretary of State William Jennings Bryan and produced
copies of the Lusitania's supplementary manifests. Bryan, impressed by
the evidence that the Lusitania had carried weapons, cleared publication
of the warning. Someone higher than the Secretary of State, likely
Colonel House, overruled Bryan. Nonetheless one ad
slipped past the State Department censorship. The single ad that slipped
past the government censors appeared in the Des Moines Register (and is
shown on the right).
The warning read: "NOTICE! Travellers intending
to embark on the Atlantic voyage are reminded that a state of war exists
between Germany and her allies and Great Britain and her allies; that
the zone of war includes the waters adjacent to the British Isles; that,
in accordance with formal notice given by the Imperial German
Government, vessels flying the flag of Great Britain, or any of her
allies, are liable to destruction in those waters and that travellers
sailing in the war zone on ships of Great Britain or her allies do so at
their own risk. IMPERIAL GERMAN EMBASSY WASHINGTON, D.C., APRIL 22,
1915."
Captain Dow, the Lusitania captain
immediately before Captain Turner, resigned on March 8, 1915 because he
was no longer willing "to carry the responsibility of mixing passengers
with munitions or contraband."4
Captain Dow
had a close call just two days earlier. He was aware the rules of naval
warfare changed in October 1914 when Churchill issued orders that
British merchant ships with munitions or contraband must ram U-boats.
Prior to this change by Churchill, both England and Germany adhered to
Cruiser Rules. Cruiser Rules enabled crews and passengers to escape in
lifeboats before being fired on. With the new Churchill ram rules, the
German U-boats could no longer surface to issue a warning and fired
while submerged. Churchill explained his ruthlessness with:
"The first British countermove, made on my
responsibility...was to deter the Germans from surface attack. The
submerged U-boat had to rely increasingly on underwater attack and thus
ran the greater risk of mistaking neutral for British ships and of
drowning neutral crews and thus embroiling Germany with other Great
Powers."5
The above combined with the next Churchill
quote speaks volumes about what really happened and why.
"There are many
kinds of maneuvers in war...There are maneuvers in time, in diplomacy,
in mechanics, in psychology; all of which are removed from the
battlefield,
but react often decisively upon it...The maneuver which brings an ally
into the field is as serviceable as that which wins a great battle."6
Operation Lusitania
On May 7, 1915, the
Lusitania slowed hoping the English escort vessel the Juno
would arrive. Unknown to Captain Turner of the Lusitania, Winston
Churchill had ordered the Juno to return to port. Churchill’s order left
the Lusitania alone and unprotected in a known area with U boats. To put
this in perspective, England had deciphered the German communications
code on December 14, 1914. The level of detail known by the British
Admiralty was so precise that U boat names and general locations were
known. For example, the British Admiralty knew U-30 left the area for
Germany on May 4th and the U-27 left the area because of jammed blow
planes.7
U-boats traveling underwater found it extremely difficult to get into
position to attack the Lusitiania. Captain Dow's previous ability to
outrun U-boats appears to be the reason for the highly unusual order
from Cunard headquarters to Captain Turner to operate only three of the
four boilers. The Cunard steamship company founded in 1840 by Samuel
Cunard, while a private company, operated under the direction of the
British Admirality. Captain Turner was further limited from operating
four boiler rooms as he and Lusitiania Chief Engineer Bryce were denied
the engineering crew to operate the fourth boiler room. The Lusitania,
unable to travel at her top speed, was intentionally slowed and sent to
a known U-boat location. Churchill is now primarily blamed but it is
important to remember Churchill did the bidding of the New World Order
to draw the US into World War I.
In a 1981 book,
Seven Days to Disaster: The Sinking of the Lusitania by Des Hickey
and Gus Smith, they reported that one of the crewmen on the U-20
responsible for passing the order to fire to the torpedo room was
Charles Voegele. Voegele refused to kill civilians of a neutral country,
and upon returning to Germany was court-martialed and imprisoned for
three years. One torpedo was fired on May 7 and the warhead's 300 pounds
of explosives detonated upon contact with the Lusitania. The Lusitania’s
Captain Turner reported the first explosion sounded "like a heavy door
being slammed shut" and was followed by a much larger explosion that
rocked the ship. Turner wrote in the log "an unusually heavy
detonation."8
The Lusitania sunk 15-18 minutes later.
On May 28, 1915, Germany's official response to
the US government's protest states the German government has no
intention to attack US vessels which are not guilty of hostile acts.
9
The Imperial German government wrote the Lusitania "was one of the
largest and fastest English commerce steamers, constructed with
government funds as auxiliary cruisers, and is expressly included in the
navy list published by the British Admiralty. It is, moreover, known to
the Imperial government from reliable information furnished by its
officials and neutral passengers that for some time practically all the
more valuable English merchant vessels have been provided with guns,
ammunition and other weapons, and reinforced with a crew specially
practiced in manning guns. According to reports at hand here, the
Lusitania when she left New York undoubtedly had guns on board which
were mounted under decks and masked." The official letter from the
German government also spells out that the Lusitania had 5,400 cases of
ammunition that would be used to kill German soldiers. An exceptionally
noteworthy section of the letter states the British merchant marine
ships received secret instruction in February by the British Admiralty
to seek protection behind neutral flags and when so disguised attack
German submarines by ramming them. The German official
response that war contraband was on board explains the second explosion.10
Despite British denials, weapon are recovered
The
elite families advancing a New World Order and Britain's leaders, even a century later,
still fear the negative repercussions from Americans when they learn
they were tricked into World War I.
For decades, the
British and American governments have denied that there were weapons on
the Lusitania. The wreckage site was declared a protective site, denying divers
access. To further frustrate the ability to determine what the Lusitania
carried, since 1946 the Royal Navy repeatedly dropped depth charges on
top of the Lusitania as a site for target practice. Common sense tells
us the Royal Navy would not desecrate the bodies of women and children
sunk with the Lusitania unless there was more to the story. In 1968, to keep the
truth secret, the British Secret Service unsuccessfully attempted to buy
the salvage rights to the Lusitania. In 1993 PBS Online visited the
wreck and determined previous visitors had tampered with the evidence.11
On April 2, 2007, Cyber Diver News Network
reported the American owner of the Lusitania, F. Gregg Bemis, Jr., won
the case to conduct salvage operations almost a century after the
sinking. The Arts and Heritage Ministry did not protest the use of the
Lusitania as a target for British depth charges but did "help" respect
the sanctity of of the site by opposing salvage operations.
While the British government aggressively worked to distort the truth,
the establish truth is Germany told the truth and the US was tricked
into war. One of the more embarrassing confirmations of this treachery
was Victor Quirke of the Cork Sub
Aqua Club found in July 2006 15,000 rounds of .303 bullets in the bow section of the
ship.
Churchill's
Treachery Confirmed
Prior to
the confirmation of weapons on the Lusitania, authors
have written for many years that 1,201 people were sacrificed on the
Lusitania to create a reason for the US to enter World War I. Historian
Howard Zinn wrote in A People's History of the United States,
that the Lusitania carried 1,248 cases of 3-inch shells, 4,927 boxes of
cartridges (1,000 rounds in each box), and 2,000 more cases of
small-arms ammunition. Colin Simpson is another researcher who exposed Churchill conspired to put
the Lusitania in danger with the hope of sparking an incident to bring
America into World War I. Historian Patrick Beesely supports Simpson's
assessment.12
Christopher Hitchens' book, Blood Class and
Nostalgia, directly puts the responsibility on Churchill as a deliberate action to pull America into
World War I. History
professor Ralph Raico and senior scholar of the Ludwig von Mises
Institute notes13 Churchill
wrote the week prior to the Lusitania sinking that it was "most
important to attract neutral shipping to our shores, in the hopes
especially of embroiling the United States with Germany."
For almost a century Churchill's treachery was dismissed as
conspirarcy nonsense. The confirmation of weapons on board and insider
accounts, confirm the Lusitania was a false flage operation but what
many researchers still do not realize is Churchill's New World Order
connection. Churchill, a
Freemason, was directly working to advance the Great Plan. He
eventually resigned his membership but this was simply a ploy to fool
the public as evidence of his New World Order involvement put his crimes
in both World Wars in a context the public would not support.
The two sides of the Goetz medal
Winston
Churchill did say and do many things to pull America into World War I.
He attempted to mislead both the British and American public that the
Lusitania was premeditated. Churchill did this for several reasons
including to distract people from reports that the Juno destroyer
protection was removed. He attributed the lack of destroyer protection
as being confused with internal disputes within the Admiralty about a
bumbled Gallipoli campaign in the Ottoman Empire. His Lusitania war
propaganda included misinforming the public that multiple torpedoes were
fired to explain how the ship sunk in 18 minutes and further fuel hatred
for the German people. Churchill also had over 250,000 reproductions of
the
Karl Goetz medal made. Most descriptions of the medal show only the
reverse side of the Goetz medal with the Lusitania sinking and the
inscription, "The liner Lusitania sunk by a German Submarine May 5,
1915." Goetz corrected the date to May 7, 1915 in a second edition, but
the incorrect date was the version reproduced by Churchill as proof of a
premeditated attack on a civilian ship.
A closer look at the above medal reveals the
inscription "No Contraband Goods!" and shows weapons falling off the
deck into the sea.
The truth of the Goetz medal's meaning was never to
celebrate the killing of civilians or reward the sailors involved for
murdering civilians but to condemn the greed of the New World Order
elite who
orchestrated the Lusitania tragedy.14
This accurate interpretation of the medal requires
knowledge of the front side of the medal. The front shows a skeleton
representing death behind a Cunard customer service window. The tickets
sold in the transaction symbolizes the money not only made by Cunard,
but by the people who tricked passengers to go onboard. On the medal
the German Ambassador to the US, Count Johann-Heinrich von Bernstorff,
wears a hat and raises a finger to warn passengers that weapons are on
the ship. A person next to him reads a newspaper with the headline "U
Boat Danger" representing the warning written by the German government.
Above the ambassador's image are the words "Geschaft Uber Alles" which
means "Business Above All."
The Karl Goetz "satirical medal" series,
numbered by author G.W. Kienast sequentially from K-131 through K-306 is
a subset of over 800 medals. The K in the number means Kienast. The
medals were produced as World War I progressed but the K number, while
close, is not the exact sequence of events.
The “satirical medal” series are unique in that
they communicate the history of World War I from the German
perspective. The series is broken
out into sub-groups:
> K-131 to K-213 World War I
> K-214 to K-260 Revolution
> K-261 to K-301 French Occupation
> K-302 to K-306 Hitler Putsch and Rebuilding
Authentic Karl Goetz productions often have a
third side with K.GOETZ on the the edge of the medal. The popular
Goetz’s medals were popular instilled national pride in Germany. The
Churchhill reproduction of the Lusitania medal was accompanied by war
propaganda cartoons, posters, post cards and postage stamps.
Many are willing to be New World Order "fronts" and "bagmen" for
a price
The
"Business Above All" message on the Goetz
medal condemns "fronts" and "bagmen." JP Morgan and his work for
the
Rothschilds is
an example of a front or bagman.
Lessons like the French Revolution taught the New World
Order elite that a lasting presence requires an ongoing
disinformation campaign to conceal their wealth and true
nature of their operations. JP Morgan (1837 -1913)
partnered with George Peabody who worked with city of
London banks including Barings and Rothschilds. In 1845
George Peabody was personally involved in previously
secret conspiracies including bribing the famous orator,
Daniel Webster, to make speeches supporting debt
repayment because Maryland, Pennsylvania and other
states terminated interest payments to European banks.15
The expensive terminated interest payments resulted in
the creation of American "fronts" for the great banking
families of Europe.
JP
Morgan led what became the largest American banking
dynasty. He profited greatly during the Civil War and
one scandal involved selling government rifles that he
bought from the government for $3.50 back at $22 per
rifle. Another profitable trade was selling his personal
yacht, the Corsair (shown in the picture on the right),
to the US during the Spanish-American War. JP Morgan
did not need the Corsair as his interest grew to
acquiring larger ships including the White Star Line. In
1934 the White
Star Line merged with Cunard and was renamed Cunard
White Star Line. In 1950, the company was renamed Cunard
Line.
JP Morgan's son, JP Morgan, Jr. (1867 - 1943) was a key
owner of both the White Star Line and the Cunard White
Star Line.
JP
Morgan, Jr. highest value as a Rothschild frontman was
likely when he helped
create the Federal Reserve although he work to bring the US into World
War I is a close second. For example in 1914 he loaned $12,000,000 to
Russia and in 1915 he loaned $50,000,000 to France. A
key reason beyond preventing terminated interest
payments that banking families want "fronts" and
"bagmen" is advancing the Great Plan via war sometimes leads to revenge.
In 1915, JP Morgan, Jr.
was almost murdered by Frank Holt. Holt claimed he
wanted to stop the war profiteering that fueled
World War I. Holt's condemnation of JP Morgan war
profiteering was correct as almost all weapons
purchased by the US and Britain were acquired through
a JP Morgan company. JP Morgan loans to the Allies in
World War I are estimated at $500,000,000.16
In
1857 the Peabody and Morgan American banking partnership
was directly influenced by the Bank of England. The
Bank of
England provided an
£800,000
bailout package in return for concessions to curtail
competition.17
Over time the
Rothschilds acquired stock and gained control. A similar
strategy enabled the Rothschilds to take the helm of the
Rockefeller flagship, Chase Manhattan. The Rothschilds
signaled the Rockefellers were subordinate when in 2000
JP Morgan executives assumed the key management
positions of JPMorgan Chase. Today, the lead Rothschild
American front man is JPMorgan Chase's chief executive
Jamie Dimon. Dimon is ultimately subordinate to
N M Rothschild & Sons Limited chairman David de
Rothschild.
Who Winston Churchill Really Served
Winston
Churchill, when in charge of the Admiralty, worked closely with his
benefactor Sir Nathan Mayer Rothschild. There are a few notable Nathan
Mayer Rothschilds in history, so the following is provided to prevent
confusion. Nathan Mayer Rothschild (1840-1915) was the nephew of Anthony
Nathan de Rothschild (1810-1876) who had no sons but was the son of
Nathan Mayer Rothschild (1777-1836). Nathan Mayer Rothschild was the
fourth child of Mayer Amschel Rothschild (1744-1812) who founded the
Rothschild banking dynasty.
Nathan Mayer
Rothschild died before the Lusitania sunk and was part of a syndicate
with J.P. Morgan working to buy up the North Atlantic shipping lines.
His intelligence agents in the US warned that Germany's émigrés to
America, absent a Lusitania-like disaster, would be effective at keeping
the US out of World War.18
Before his death, "Lord" Nathan Mayer Rothschild had access to the
admiralty reports on German naval operations.
British Commander Joseph Kenworthy was
present in the high-command map room as the Lusitania headed toward a
known U-boat position. He had been previously asked by Churchill to
write a paper on the political fallout of an ocean liner being sunk and
killing American passengers. In 1927 he wrote,
The Freedom of the
Seas
revealing "The Lusitania was sent at considerably reduced speed into an
area where a U-boat was known to be waiting and with her escorts
withdrawn." Colonel House, meeting with King George V just hours before
the Lusitania was sunk, discussed the likely American reaction to the
King's question "Suppose they should sink the Lusitania with American
passengers on board...."19
Churchill, in an effort to maximize American casualties, ordered
the British destroyer HMS Juno to return without picking up a single
person. The HMS Juno, under the command of Rear Admiral Hood, was so
close that Lusitania survivors were able to see the ship approach and leave.
The 1915 Lusitania false flag leads to war being declared
in 1917
Berlin announced on
January 31, 1917 that its submarines would sink all ships aiding
Britain. The Berlin announcement, combined with the previous Lusitania
sinking, was still not enough for America to enter the war. The British
Intelligence service manufactured another bombshell in the form of a
telegram from German Foreign Minister Arthur Zimmerman to the German
Minister to Mexico. The telegram, presented to Woodrow Wilson on
February 24, 1917, offered Mexico money to attack the US. The numerous
British propaganda campaigns ultimately proved successful and on April
6, 1917 the US did declare war on Germany. This technique has been
successfully used many times including when the New World Order
September 11, 2001 false flag operation was followed in 2002 with a
British intelligence report20
that
helped fool Americans that Iraq had weapons of Mass Destruction.
How
does this relate to current wars?
In
the 1930s when the identities of the Federal Reserve designers began to
surface. On May 23, 1933, Congressman Louis T. McFadden brought formal
charges against the Board of the Federal Reserve Bank system, where he
accused them of war profiteering.
He said: "Some people who think that the Federal Reserve Banks
are United States
Government institutions. They are private monopolies which prey upon the
people of these United States for the benefit of themselves and their
foreign customers; foreign and domestic speculators and swindlers; and
rich and predatory money lender. In that dark crew of financial pirates
there are those who would cut a man's throat to get a dollar out of his
pocket; there are those who send money into states to buy votes to
control our legislatures; there are those who maintain International
propaganda for the purpose of deceiving us into granting of new
concessions which will permit them to cover up their past misdeeds and
set again in motion their gigantic train of crime.
These twelve private credit monopolies were deceitfully and disloyally
foisted upon this Country by the bankers who came here from Europe and
repaid our hospitality by undermining our American institutions. Those
bankers took money out of this Country to finance Japan in a war against
Russia…Mr. Chairman, there should be no partisanship in matters
concerning banking and currency affairs in this Country, and I do not
speak with any.”21
On November 21, 1933, Franklin Delano Roosevelt who had been President
Woodrow Wilson’s assistant secretary of the Navy, wrote to Colonel
House:
"The real truth of the
matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the larger
centers has owned the Government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson,
and I am not wholly excepting the administration of W.W. (Woodrow
Wilson). The country is going through a repetition of Jackson's fight
with the Bank of the United States -- only on a far bigger broader
basis."22
Colonel
House knew the truth of the matter because he and his father, Thomas
William House, were confidential American agents of banking interests in
London believed to be the Rothschilds. Colonel House is famous in
history for being the person that selected Woodrow Wilson to be the 1913
Democratic party candidate for president.23
The Federal Reserve private banking cartel enforced by public law was
replicated on a global scale with the creation of the Bank for
International Settlements (BIS).24
The BIS was established by the Hague agreements of 1930 and is
headquartered in Basel, Switzerland. The privately owned BIS coordinates
with 55 member central banks include the Fed. The BIS owners facilitate
global monetary control by helping manage Gresham’s Law that bad money
drives out good.25
Bad money refers to fiat money that is not backed by assets with value
such as money backed by gold or silver.
In summary, World War I was to advance the Great
Plan
The Federal Reserve,
evolved as a "front" for European banking families following failed past
attempts to seize control of the Bank of the United States and the
refusal in 1845 when several states elected to discontinue repaying debt
to foreign banks. The European banking families needed their private
banking cartel to be enforced by US law and achieved this with their
design of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913.26
The cycle of debt
often starts with selling weapons. Governments go in debt to buy
weapons. The weapons manufacturers make money on the sale and the
bankers make a financial "killing" on the interest from the
weapons-generated debt. The weapon sales accelerate if a government is
faced with a perceived or real threat. False reports are produced, often
by the hidden hand of war profiteers, to trick the citizens of a country
to support the call for war. The country in the world that buys the most
weapons is the US. To understand how debt is driven up by war today,
see the documentary
Iraq for Sale.27
Not surprisingly, we are heading toward a cliff
due to a privately owned central bank with owners that benefit from
military spending. When people understand that without economic justice
peace is not possible, a brighter future is possible.
By Dave Dionisi on May 23, 2011
To access the footnotes,
click here
